Wilhelm (Guglielmo) Plüschow (1852-1930) - Male and Female Nudes - Albumen Print circa 1900

 

And now, as they say in the Monte Python world of the inane and insane, time for something really different ..... but still within the realm of the Academic Nude. This beautiful circa 1900 framed albumen print is on its way from an art dealer in Berlin as I write this. My first love has always been photography (yes, I have a darkroom setup which has gone unused since digital photography became the norm and I bought a digital back for my Hasselblad cameras) and well before I decided to turn what little artistic talent I have left on collecting 19th and early 20th century academic works centered on the human form. Being one to appreciate the works of 19th and early 20th century artists I decided I had to invest my tax return and free government money (don't worry American taxpayer, you will never have to repay this jackass worthy folly of our leaders in your lifetime and screw your grandkids, the little brats deserve all this stupid debt, let them pay it back... let's all take a page from the stupid Marxist liberals in this country and live like there's no tomorrow! Open the borders and let the world in because Amazon, Apple, and Google need slave labor.....We all know that Marxism has been a grand success wherever it's been tried especially for the leaders.... i.e. North Korea) ...... on something special and I found this albumen print which fit the bill perfectly. You probably have heard of the photographer but I'll just give you a brief overview of his biography from online sources:

"Guglielmo Plüschow (born Wilhelm Plüschow; August 18, 1852 – January 3, 1930) was a German photographer who moved to Italy and became known for his nude photos of local youths, predominantly males. Plüschow was a cousin of Wilhelm von Gloeden, who, despite taking up nude photography later than Plüschow, soon overshadowed him. Plüschow was several times at odds with the law and charged with corruption of minors. Today, his photography is recognized for its artistic merits, but it generally is considered somewhat inferior to von Gloeden's because of his less graceful handling of lighting and the sometimes strangely stilted poses of his models."      

                     ---------------------------------------------------------------------------